Don't believe everything you read. 。
As many Harry Potter fans know, for the series' 20th anniversary this year Bloomsbury released new editions of the first book. These new editions come in four different designs, one for each of the four Hogwarts Houses, with extra features and fun facts tailored to each.。
SEE ALSO:Cozy up inside the Hogwarts house of your choosing for the winter。Though these new editions hit shelves this past summer, eagle eyed readers are now noticing some pretty blatant errors in the books.。
Thanks for signing up! 。
First reported on the fan site The Rowling Library, the Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw editions have a facts page in the back about the professors who head those Houses, Sprout and Flitwick respectively. The books list those two as having once dated. As adorable and odd-coupled as that would have been, it's also completely made up. 。Credit: The Rowling Library。 Credit: The Rowling Library 。As。
Mashable 。readers know, we here spend a lot of time reading JK Rowling's tweets. But Rowling has never written or tweeted about a Sprout/Flitwick pairing. The humor site CollegeHumor, however, did include a fake photoshopped tweet in a Rowling roundup that seems to be the source of Bloomsbury's mistake. 。
Credit: collegehumor。
Maybe we should tweet at her and ask. 。
(责任编辑:焦點)
Nancy Pelosi warns colleagues after info hacked
Listen to a dog perfectly nail the hook from Britney Spear's 'Toxic'
NAV Alliance forms to make tech for self
After Annapolis newsroom shooting, focus turns to Trump's media bashing
Olympian celebrates by ordering an intimidating amount of McDonald's
Jaguar escaped from the zoo and killed a bunch of animals and now I'm sad!
Seth Rogen just discovered a woman is traveling Russia with a Seth Rogen cardboard cutout
While Trump embarrassed himself in the UK, Obama released his summer reading list
Tributes flow after death of former Singapore president S.R. Nathan
The best memes about LeBron James leaving Cleveland for Los Angeles
Pole vaulter claims his penis is not to blame
'Gotti' appears to be posting fake positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes