On Sunday,The Guardianrevealed internal documents from Facebook that uncovered how the social media corporation moderates everything from hate speech to live streams.
The guide—which is filled with examples of how to handle sexual content, animal abuse and violent deaths—has pried open the conversation regarding online ethics, and people have begun to hop on Twitter to share their immediate thoughts, many of which aren't so great for Facebook.
SEE ALSO:Secret Facebook documents reveal how site battles violent contentFolks have expressed their confusion about the subjective rules, and are questioning the logic behind particular parts of the guide.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
One section of the guidelines is particularly controversial. It specifies that "aspirational violence" like threatening to "beat up fat kids" is still okay, versus, say, writing "someone shoot Trump."
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
It's safe to say this is a discussion that isn't ending anytime soon.
TopicsFacebook
(责任编辑:知識)
Samsung Galaxy Note7 teardown reveals the magic behind the phone's iris scanner
You don't have to pay extra to get an Uber at Sydney Airport
Coworkers Photoshopped a sleeping intern into an affectionate meme
Instagram's new business profiles spotted in the wild
Nate Parker is finally thinking about the woman who accused him of rape
Seth MacFarlane heads to space 300 years from now in big TV comeback
Fort McMurray wildfire has burned area larger than entire city of Chicago
3 times you should hit 'reset' on the job search — and how to do it
PlayStation Now game streaming is coming to PC
Here's all the merch you'll want from Justin Bieber's Purpose World Tour
Make money or go to Stanford? Katie Ledecky is left with an unfair choice.
You don't have to pay extra to get an Uber at Sydney Airport