当前位置:首页 >焦點 >【】

【】

2024-11-22 01:03:20 [探索] 来源:有聲有色網

Over the past week,influencers who've promoted altcoins, highly volatile alternative cryptocurrencies, have sought to distance themselves from the coins they once supported.

"[I] let my followers know and was extremely clear about how you shouldn't invest a dollar into this... that you can't afford to lose," said FaZe Banks, a co-founder of the popular esports team FaZe Clan, in a statement posted on Twitter. "To suggest I would ever knowingly scam my following for a quick buck is unfair and simply not true."

Banks' post was in response to an altcoin called BankSocial, which he promoted through a giveaway in May. BankSocial rose in value right after Banks' promotion and then promptly plummeted after many big early investors sold off. This is known as a pump and dump and it often leaves those who got in at the time of an influencers' promotion at a loss of their investment.

Mashable ImageA now-deleted tweet from FaZe Banks promoting a BankSocial token giveaway.Credit: mashable screenshot

However, influencers aren't the only ones looking to set the record straight. After Mashable's investigation into influencers promoting altcoinspublished last week, the team behind BankSocial reached out.


Prime Day deals you can shop right now

Products available for purchase here through affiliate links are selected by our merchandising team. If you buy something through links on our site, Mashable may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Shark RV2310 Matrix Vacuum With Self-Cleaning Brushroll—$179.99(List Price $299.99)

  • Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 10.9" 64GB Wi-Fi Tablet—$142.49(List Price $219.99)

  • Apple AirPods Pro 2nd Gen With MagSafe USB-C Charging Case—$168.99(List Price $249.00)

  • Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker With 6-Months Membership—$99.95(List Price $159.95)

  • Apple Watch Series 9 (GPS, 41mm, Midnight, S/M, Sports Band)—$279.99(List Price $399.00)


Mashable's conversation with BankSocialprovides an interesting peek behind the scenes of one such deal with an influencer to hawk these cryptocurrencies to their fans.

BankSocial's Side of the Story

"They pumped it and then they dumped it," explained BankSocial CEO John Wingatein a phone call with Mashable, referring to FaZe Banks and those who bought into the token on his advice. "Then he backed out of the deal."

Wingate claims that BankSocial was a victim as well. The company claims it paid FaZe Banks to be an ambassador for the token and had a deal for a certain number of promotional posts. The token tanked shortly after Banks' promotion. BankSocial feels the dump was spurred by those within Banks' orbit who allegedly invested due to his promotion with the intent to sell quickly. And then BankSocial got caught up in the controversy of FaZe Banks promoting what turned out to be a pump and dump of their token, while Banks abruptly cut their deal short.

BankSocial is now trying to protect their project and its brand name in the aftermath.

It should be noted that looking through some since-deleted posts from FaZe Banks promoting BankSocial, Banks never discloses his exact relationship with the altcoin.

Shortly after Banks sent out his promotion of BankSocial via the giveaway, another member of FaZe Clan, FaZe Kay, replied on Twitter about his quick return on investment.

"I'm 2x already," Kay tweeted.

Mashable ImageA since deleted tweet from FaZe Kay about BankSocial.Credit: Mashable Screenshot

"When it all went down, we got on the phone with Ricky [Banks] and we were like, what the fuck? Like, why are your guys posting I'm making '2x'...you pretty much laid out [in the article] exactly how we felt after the whole thing went down," Wingate said, referring to Kay doubling his investment in BankSocial.

BankSocial provided Mashable with some details of their deal with FaZe Banks. They did not pay him in the token, so his take-home pay was not directly correlated with the altcoins performance. According to BankSocial, the company was looking for more online engagement and brand awareness than actual investment in the project.

BankSocial previously had highs of as many as 8,000 wallet holders, but have lost 400 to 500 wallets since that time. Wingate told Mashable only around 200 wallet holders that bought during the FaZe Banks promotion were still holding onto the token.

While Wingate wouldn't share exactly how much they paid FaZe Banks, he did provide some details. BankSocial did not pay Banks in the altcoin, so his pay was not directly correlated with how the token performed. "It wasn't a small amount," Wingate said in terms of how much Banks was paid for his promotion of BankSocial. "For what I'm concerned, it was a substantial amount."

Wingate gave me a peek into the pay range we're usually talking about when it comes to these deals during another part of our conversation where he discussed how easy it would have been for them to hire other influencers in the aftermath to pump the coin again.

"We had the ability...to get another influencer to pump it up," he explained. "We have the ability to do it. We could go hire some guy for $50,000 or $100,000 or whatever it is."

This is something Wingate says BankSocial did not want to do, saying they are through with influencers after the failed FaZe Banks deal and are only interested in long-term relationships with ambassadors, such as more well-established professional athletes.

"We really do want to legitimize as much as we can how crypto can be beneficial to decentralization of the traditional economic models," Wingate said.

If one is wondering why BankSocial went with FaZe Banks to promote the altcoin, look no further than his name. "Everybody was coming to us wanting to be an influencer for BankSocial," Wingate claimed. "We only made a deal with one influencer because his name was Banks...we thought it was the perfect play."

Mashable Light SpeedWant more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories?Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter.By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.Thanks for signing up!

Wingate did say the company looked into Banks before signing the deal. According to the BankSocial CEO, they couldn't find any other cryptocurrency promotions from Banks, which was a positive in their eyes.

"You know, he seemed clean. Right?" Wingate told Mashable. "Like he seemed like we were really getting a long-term ambassador. I'm not going to go out on a limb and say that FaZe Banks did this intentionally. Right? Because I don't know," said Wingate.

According to BankSocial CEO Wingate, the deal ended before it was supposed to because Banks wanted out. However, Banks allegedly kept the money BankSocial paid him despite not following through on the promotions.

"It's very odd that he was supposed to do several more posts [as part of our deal] and then he cited some loophole that he had that says if the token doesn't perform to a certain point, he's not going to have to promote any more," Wingate shared. "Well, it's like, yeah, you basically did that yourself, you know?"

FaZe Banks has continuously stood by his claim that BankSocial is a "project he genuinely believes in," claiming this is why he shared it with his fans. He says he has personally invested his own money in the token and still holds onto it.

Mashable has not been able to confirm this claim, as individuals can hold multiple wallets.

FaZe Banks' Side

Mashable attempted to reach FaZe Banks to inquire about his deal with BankSocial. After a brief back-and-forth with a FaZe Clan press representative over email, Mashable did not hear back. We have provided the contact with questions and will update this piece if we do.

FaZe Banks' previously mentioned statement on BankSocial, which was released on Twitter, was posted as a reply to YouTuber Coffeezilla. The creator hosts a popular channel on the platform that looks into online scams. He recently uploaded a video looking into FaZe Clan's promotions of cryptocurrencies.

After the video was posted, Banks reached out to Coffeezilla. The video did not include the BankSocial issue, but it did spark a broader online conversation about FaZe Clan and crypto.

According to a tweet from Banks, he had a private conversation with Coffeezilla to "clear his name" and "show him all the receipts."

Coffeezilla did not share the details of the call with Banks out of respect for privacy, but he did provide some broader details in a brief phone discussion with Mashable.

According to Coffeezilla, the $10,000 giveaway that Banks ran as a promotion for BankSocial did happen. Banks showed Coffeezilla the wallet transaction. This shows just how much of the token was transferred to another wallet holder, in this case the winner of the giveaway.

However, being that the giveaway was in the form of the token, the dump substantially affected the value of the token. So, the giveaway amounted to substantially less than $10,000 because the coin immediately tanked.

Banks later publicly sharedthe Twitter handle of the winner. BankSocial CEO Wingate told me that he could not confirm who received it and the legitimacy of the giveaway. The only proof he had that the giveaway happened was Banks' tweet and the reaction from the winner, which "seemed genuine."

While Banks claims to still hold his BankSocial token investment, Coffeezilla said the wallet he was shown did not hold any of the tokens. It's unclear however if Banks has a separate wallet holding BankSocial tokens, which is possible.

Banks has not provided any other details of the deal, such as the "substantial amount" he was paid in U.S. dollars by BankSocial.

With what we know and the since-deleted social media posts available to us, Banks' promotion of BankSocial does not appear to comply with the Federal Trade Commissions' (FTC) own guidelinesfor influencers posting paid advertisements to their social channels.

The fallout

FaZe Banks and BankSocial are far from the only people trying to clear the air regarding the pervasion of influencers pushing altcoins.

"I want you all to know that I had no ill intent promoting any crypto alt coins," reads a June 27 tweet from FaZe Kay. "I honestly & naively thought we all had a chance to win which just isn’t the case."

"It was so irresponsible of me to speak publicly about any coins without knowing more & knowing now that they can do more harm than good," he continued.

FaZe Kay was a prominent promoter of numerous altcoins. He, along with other members of FaZe Clan and YouTubers like RiceGum, pushed pump and dump cryptocurrencies to their fans. Perhaps the most egregious example was Save The Kids token, which prominently featured the social media stars on their website. The cryptocurrency lasted around two weeks before, according to the developer contracted for the project, the founders "disappeared" with the funding.

Sometime late last week, in the ongoing effort for influencers to back away from their altcoin promotions, Save The Kids removed these influencers from its website. But just because FaZe Clan is backing off altcoin marketing for now, that doesn't mean the problem is gone.

Three days ago, YouTube superstar-turned-boxer Logan Paul announced he was "all in" on the "dumbest, most ridiculous shitcoin he's ever seen," called Dink Doink.

Dink Doink did indeed pump on June 28, when Paul posted about the altcoin. The downward trajectory started not long after, later that same day. Just three days later it's now lost more than half of its value. It's unclear if Paul is still "all in."

And, on the morning of July 1, right before this piece was published, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and a regular promoter of cryptocurrency, Elon Musk, tweeted about Doge.

"Baby Doge, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo," Musk tweeted in reference to the children's song, "Baby Shark."

However, Musk wasn't talking about Dogecoin, the popular meme-based cryptocurrency that has acted as the main inspiration for the vast majority of altcoins. No, he was talking about a new altcoin trying to piggyback off of Dogecoin's success, called Baby Doge.

Baby Doge immediately almost doubled in value and reached an all-time high for the token after Musk's tweet.

It remains to be seen what happens with Baby Doge next, but it feels like we know how this story ends.

Related Video: How to buy, use, and spend Bitcoin

TopicsCryptocurrency

(责任编辑:時尚)

    推荐文章
    • Here's what 'Game of Thrones' actors get up to between takes

      Here's what 'Game of Thrones' actors get up to between takesWarning: Contains some mild Season 6 spoilers right at the end (the video is spoiler-free).。LONDON - ...[详细]
    • 菜花變紫是怎麽回事

      菜花變紫是怎麽回事花菜發紫是怎麽回事?你好,沒事的自然現象因為咱們吃得白花菜是屬於沒有完全開放的花蕾之類的東東開花後它的莖部就是略紫色+白色的所以時間長了或者晚些收獲就會發紫了 。。花菜變紫是怎麽回事?平時澆水不當所致, ...[详细]
    • 螃蟹流出來的黃東西是什麽

      螃蟹流出來的黃東西是什麽螃蟹流出來的黃東西是什麽-業百科螃蟹流出來的黃色物質是蟹黃,蟹黃不是螃蟹的卵,雖然成分和蟹卵基本一致,但兩者有本質區別 。蟹黃中含有未排出體外的卵細胞,但還有其它螃蟹的器官、 。蒸螃蟹流出來的黃色是什麽? ...[详细]
    • 炒包菜絲怎麽做好吃

      炒包菜絲怎麽做好吃包菜絲怎麽炒好吃?素炒包菜這樣炒才好吃,做法步驟:1.把包菜的葉子剝下來,放到清水中投洗幹淨,瀝淨水分,再把包菜切成絲。2.西紅柿切去果蒂,再把西紅柿切成三角塊,尖椒去蒂。包心菜切絲怎麽炒好吃-九州醉 ...[详细]
    • Here's George Takei chilling in zero gravity for the 'Star Trek' anniversary

      Here's George Takei chilling in zero gravity for the 'Star Trek' anniversaryThere's nothing like good friends, good memories and zero gravity to celebrate a milestone. 。In honor ...[详细]
    • 分手快樂歌曲原唱

      分手快樂歌曲原唱前言 :答:梁靜茹~歌曲名稱:分手快樂出版年代:2003年發行公司:滾石唱片語言類別:國語作詞:姚若龍作曲:郭文賢我無法幫你預言你自信時候真的美多了你發誓你會活的有笑容沒人能把誰的幸福沒收看透徹了心就會 ...[详细]
    • 導管是什麽意思梗

      導管是什麽意思梗導管是什麽意思網絡用語?網絡用語導管意思是指維管植物木質部由柱狀細胞構成的水分與無機鹽長距離運輸係統,次生壁厚薄不勻地加厚,端壁穿孔或完全溶解,從而形成縱向連續通道  。同時,還...血栓是什麽?血栓是什 ...[详细]
    • 牙簽攪水缸是什麽梗

      牙簽攪水缸是什麽梗“牙簽攪大缸”的下一句是什麽?“牙簽攪大缸”的下一句是“滴水入大江”。歇後語:中國勞動人民自古以來在生活實踐中創造的一種特殊語言形式,是一種短小、風趣、形象的語句。它由前後兩部分...牙簽搗水缸什麽意 ...[详细]
    • Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon tax

      Two states took big steps this week to get rid of the tampon taxThis week was a big one for those advocating against a tampon tax.。 First, on Thursday, California t ...[详细]
    • 青芒太硬了怎麽催熟

      青芒太硬了怎麽催熟青芒硬的沒熟怎麽催熟-九州醉餐飲網將蘋果或者香蕉和需要催熟的芒果放在一個袋子裏麵密封 。一般來說三天到五天芒果就能成熟了 。也可以將芒果放在太陽底下或者是別的溫度相對比較高的。青芒怎麽催熟青芒的催熟方法- ...[详细]
    热点阅读